A fresh constitutional and political battle has erupted over the parliamentary seat of detained Asante Akyem North Member of Parliament, Kwame Ohene Frimpong, after Majority Leader Mahama Ayariga indicated that Parliament is unlikely to declare the seat vacant despite the legislator’s prolonged absence from parliamentary proceedings.
The development has reignited controversy over the fate of the first-time lawmaker, who remains in detention abroad following his arrest at Schiphol Airport in Amsterdam on May 8, 2026, over allegations of money laundering and romance scam-related offences linked to an international investigation.
With Parliament having resumed sittings, questions have intensified over whether Article 97(1)(c) of the 1992 Constitution should now be invoked to declare the Asante Akyem North seat vacant.
The constitutional provision states that a Member of Parliament may lose his or her seat after being absent from fifteen consecutive sittings of Parliament without the permission of the Speaker and without providing a satisfactory explanation to the Committee on Privileges.
However, speaking on Citi FM’s Eyewitness News on Wednesday, July 15, Majority Leader Mahama Ayariga argued that the circumstances surrounding the MP’s absence make his case fundamentally different from one involving voluntary absenteeism.
According to Mahama Ayariga, Parliament has consistently interpreted the Constitution by taking into account the reasons behind a Member’s absence before invoking the constitutional provision relating to the vacation of parliamentary seats.
He explained that where a legislator is prevented from attending parliamentary sittings because of circumstances beyond his or her control, particularly where the person is under arrest or facing prosecution outside the country, Parliament has traditionally allowed the judicial process to run its full course before taking any constitutional action.
“The practice of the House has always been that if a person is absent due to circumstances beyond the control of that person, we wait. Such as, the person is arrested and incarcerated and being prosecuted,” the Majority Leader stated.
He stressed that an MP who is in detention cannot be treated in the same manner as one who deliberately absents himself from parliamentary duties.
“The person is absent because he has been apprehended elsewhere and is being detained against his will and even if he wanted to come to Parliament, he would not be able to come,” he explained.
Mahama Ayariga further warned that relying solely on the number of parliamentary sittings missed without considering the reasons behind the absence could create a dangerous constitutional precedent capable of undermining Ghana’s democratic system.
He argued that if Parliament were to declare a seat vacant simply because an MP had been arrested or detained, political opponents could exploit the legal system by initiating unfounded or politically motivated criminal proceedings against elected lawmakers in order to trigger by-elections.
“If we allowed that precedent, what will happen is that an MP is arrested on the basis of trumped-up charges and then after 15 days, I will say his seat is vacant,” he cautioned.
The comments have added another layer to the growing legal and political controversy surrounding the Asante Akyem North legislator, whose arrest has attracted national and international attention since Dutch authorities detained him shortly after he arrived in Amsterdam from Accra.
The MP, popularly known as OK Frimpong, entered Parliament after recording one of the biggest political upsets in Ghana’s 2024 general elections.
After breaking away from the New Patriotic Party (NPP), he contested the Asante Akyem North parliamentary seat as an Independent candidate and defeated both the NPP and National Democratic Congress (NDC) candidates by polling 26,926 votes.
His victory made history as one of the biggest electoral wins ever recorded by an Independent parliamentary candidate in the Fourth Republic.
Although elected as an Independent MP, Kwame Ohene Frimpong later aligned himself with the NDC Majority Caucus in Parliament, effectively strengthening the governing side’s numerical advantage in the House.
His decision to work with the Majority Caucus significantly altered the political balance in Parliament and has become central to current debates over the future of the seat.
The legislator’s legal troubles began after he was arrested by Dutch authorities acting on a request linked to an investigation initiated by authorities in the United States.
He is reportedly facing allegations involving money laundering and romance scam-related offences, although he has publicly denied involvement in romance fraud and has maintained that the only allegation formally communicated to him at the time of his arrest was money laundering.
About the Author
